Connect with us


China blocks tools helping Citizens bypass the Great Firewall

“In the lead-up to the country’s quinquennial party conference, which will see a top leadership transfer, tools assisting Chinese internet users in getting over the Great Firewall look to be facing a fresh round of crackdowns. “



China blocks tools helping Citizens bypass the Great Firewall

In the lead-up to the country’s quinquennial party conference, which will see a top leadership transfer, tools assisting Chinese internet users in getting over the Great Firewall look to be facing a fresh round of crackdowns.

Greater control is not at all unusual during politically sensitive times in a country, but in China, the strain on censorship-circumvention technologies seems to be at an entirely new level.

A censorship monitoring tool with a focus on China, Great Firewall Report, claims in a GitHub post that “Starting on October 3, 2022 (Beijing Time), more than 100 users reported that at least one of their TLS-based censorship circumvention servers had been stopped.”

Data transported over the internet is encrypted using the widely used internet security standard known as TLS, or transport layer security. Many censorship circumvention apps and services employ TLS to protect user privacy because data shared over a TLS connection is encrypted and difficult to read.

Instead of forwarding internet traffic to one’s internet provider, a TLS-based virtual private network, or VPN, sends that traffic through a TLS connection.

However, it appears that Chinese censors have found a way to undermine this tactic. “The blockage is carried out by shutting off the particular port that the circumvention services use to communicate.

The entire IP address may be prohibited if the user keeps utilizing the circumvention tools while changing the blocked port to a non-blocked port, according to the post from GFW Report.

Over half of Chinese internet users who bypass online censorship, according to estimates from GFW Report, do it by using TLS-based methods.

China blocks tools helping Citizens bypass the Great Firewall

Tech-savvy users can purchase their own domains and set up services to get around the so-called “Great Firewall (GFW),” a complex censorship system created by the Chinese government to control internet access in the nation by, for example, blocking or slowing down some international online services. However, many internet users choose ready-to-use subscription services from resellers instead, which largely rely on TLS-based methods, according to GFW Report.

The organization states, “The TLS-based tools have supposedly been stopped before, but we have never seen it got [sic] blocked on such a scale.”

At the same time, they have been working with other developers for months on several backup plans which will get released soon to alleviate the blocking.

Trojan, Xray, V2Ray TLS+Websocket, VLESS, and gRPC are some of the TLS-based censorship circumvention tools that are supposedly restricted, according to Great Firewall Report, but it has not yet heard any indications that naiveproxy, another tool used to circumvent censorship, has been blocked.

The less technological segment has limited options while some may keep coming up with new strategies to “catch-me-if-you-can” the nation’s censors.

Major VPN apps have been taken down from the Android and App Stores ever since China banned the illicit use of VPNs in 2017 – albeit unrestricted internet access can be given for specified use cases, such university research or cross-border companies.

Apps that evade censorship but are blocked by states frequently become unblocked quickly. If a provider is removed from an app store, they may quickly resurface under a new name and appearance, continuing the process forever if they are removed again.

According to Benjamin Ismail, project director at Apple Censorship, about 200 VPN services it surveyed last summer were not available in China’s app stores, with Belarus coming in second with 21 VPN apps not available. Apple Censorship is a project that is not affiliated with Apple but monitors when the company gives in to censorship demands.

Internet service bans can also be arbitrary. Some of Google, Twitter, Facebook, and other prominent services are long unavailable in China, but some of their lesser-known services are still permitted.

Many services are not blocked until a specific incident or increase in usage brings them to the attention of regulators. For instance, the voice-based social network Clubhouse briefly saw a boom in China, where users could openly express their opinions and engage in politically sensitive conversations before the app was eventually banned.

China blocks tools helping Citizens bypass the Great Firewall

Until recently, a few of Google’s less sensitive products were available in China.

On September 30, Kyle Wiggers reported that Google Translate had stopped working in China. The parent company later acknowledged that the service had been discontinued in mainland China “due to low usage,” indicating that it had been voluntarily discontinued rather than subject to a ban.

However, the GFW Report’s findings imply that perhaps new limitations on Google services have been placed by the government. and all of its subdomains ending in * have been blocked in China, affecting more than 1,100 domains and a wide range of well-known services, including,,,,, and, according to a post on the censorship tracking platform on October 1.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


UK Government To Set Online Bill Criminalizing Self Harm



UK Government Sets Online Bill To Criminalize Self Harm

In an effort to stop what it calls “tragic and preventable deaths caused by people seeing self-harm content online,” the UK government has announced it will further broaden the scope of online safety legislation by making encouraging self-harm a crime.

According to the most recent modification to the divisive but popular Online Safety Bill, in-scope platforms would be compelled to remove anything that purposefully encourages someone to physically harm themselves, or face legal repercussions.

The government intends to tackle “abhorrent trolls urging the young and vulnerable to self-harm,” according to the secretary of state for digital. People who post such content online may also be prosecuted under the new offence of encouraging self injury.

The maximum fines will be announced in due time, according to the administration.

In the UK, it is already unlawful to promote or aid suicide, whether in person or online. By creating a new offense, self-harm content will now be subject to the same laws that already ban suicide promotion.

Following a snag, last summer associated with political unrest in the ruling Conservative Party, the Online Safety Bill’s progress through parliament is now on hold. However, the newly reorganized UK government has declared that it will reintroduce the measure to parliament next month after making changes to the law.

The abuse of intimate imagery is a problem that will be addressed by recent revisions to the Online Safety Bill, which was just made public by the Ministry of Justice. However, other revisions are planned regarding “legal but harmful” information, thus the final form of the Act is still up in the air.

The government responded to concerns about the bill’s impact on online freedom of expression a few months ago. The (new) secretary of state, Michelle Donelan, announced in September that she would be “editing” the bill to lessen concern about its impact on “legal but harmful” speech for adults.

The most recent changes, making it illegal to send online communications encouraging self harm, came after that announcement.

UK Government Sets Online Bill To Criminalize Self Harm

Donelan was quoted by the BBC as claiming that Molly Russell, a 14-year-old teenager who committed suicide five years ago after watching thousands of online articles on self-harm and suicide on websites like Instagram and Pinterest, was a factor in the most recent changes.

Social media was found to have contributed to Russell’s death, according to the results of an inquest into her death in September. While the coroner’s “prevention of future deaths” report from last month that a number of steps be done to control and monitor young people’s access to social media content.

The addition of the crime of promoting self harm, according to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media, and Sport, will outlaw “one of the most worrying and prevalent internet harms that now falls below the threshold of criminal behavior.”

Donelan stated in a statement:

“I am determined that the abhorrent trolls encouraging the young and vulnerable to self-harm are brought to justice.

“So I am strengthening our online safety laws to make sure these vile acts are stamped out and the perpetrators face jail time.

“Social media firms can no longer remain silent bystanders either and they’ll face fines for allowing this abusive and destructive behaviour to continue on their platforms under our laws.”

Hate crimes, rules regarding revenge porn (including disseminating deepfake porn without content), harassment, and cyberstalking are among the other top criminal offenses already mentioned in the bill.

Regardless of what the measure states on paper, there are still a lot of unknowns regarding how platforms will react to having legal obligations imposed on them to police all forms of speech, as well as if it would actually increase web user safety as claimed.

Critics worry that the regime will have a chilling effect by turning platforms into de facto speech police and encouraging them to overblock content in order to reduce their legal risk of paying a hefty fine.

The regime’s penalties scale up to 10% of global annual turnover, and non-cooperative senior executives even run the risk of going to jail.

On Monday, December 5, the bill is scheduled to return to parliament.








Continue Reading


Twitter Amnesty Is What Elon Musk is Going For Next



Twitter Amnesty Is What Elon Musk is Going For Next

Tesla CEO and newly appointed Twitter CEO, Elon Musk did promise a new dimension for the micro-blogging social media platform prior to taking over, and his actions recently, have just about lived up to the promise, but now, the billionaire is set for an ‘amnesty’ that surely will drive some political divides nuts if certain individuals are granted Twitter amnesty as he wants.

Elon Musk announced on Thursday that starting the next week, Twitter will provide suspended accounts “a general amnesty.” The day before, the platform’s CEO published a poll asking users if they thought affected accounts should be restored.

The announcement comes just after Musk lifted the platform’s restriction on former president Donald Trump after conducting a related poll. Trump declared he had no intention of returning to the platform despite being banned following the attack on the US Capitol on January 6, 2021.

Users of the Twitter platform who had their accounts suspended could rejoin the network “assuming they have not broken the law or engaged in egregious spam,” according to Musk’s user survey.

Twitter Amnesty Is What Elon Musk is Going For Next

The survey received responses from about 3.2 million individuals, who voted 72.4% in favor of amnesty.

“The people have spoken. Amnesty begins next week. Vox Populi, Vox Dei,” Musk said, using a Latin phrase that means “The voice of the people is the voice of god.”

Historically, Twitter has deactivated accounts who advocate violence, celebrate hate and harassment, or persistently disseminate false information that may be harmful.

Some well-known people who were banned from the website include MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell, who made a number of claims that Trump actually won the 2020 presidential election, former Trump advisor and former executive chairman of Breitbart Steve Bannon, who said Anthony Fauci and FBI Director Christopher Wray should be beheaded, and Proud Boys founder Gavin McInnes, who broke the website’s rule against violent extremist groups.

Considering that more voices with possibly negative views will be returning to the site, it’s unclear from Musk’s brief post how Twitter will handle content control going forward.

These worries have only grown as a result of Musk’s huge firings and the outflow of workers who would rather leave than remain “hardcore.”

Elon Musk is surely growing more unpopular by remaining popular these days.

Continue Reading


Twitter Working On New Feature For Long Texts



Twitter Working On New Feature For Long Texts

Writing a thread on Twitter can be considered daunting especially when you have to divide the text into 280-character sections for it to make meaning.

Good news though as the platform is stated to be working on a way to convert lengthy texts into threads automatically.

When a tweet exceeds the 280-character limit, Twitter’s composer will automatically divide it into a thread, according to a tweet from app researcher Jane Manchun Wong.

Twitter wants to make making threads less difficult, as she stated in a message to a user (identified as me).

Currently, in order to add a tweet to a thread and post the subsequent 280 characters, users must click the Add button. This can be particularly unpleasant when you are trying out an idea or pasting information from another document.

Several users have recently brought up the difficulty posting to and reading conversations with more than a few tweets; the thread in question was 82 tweets long and focused on the defunct crypto-currency exchange FTX. In response, Musk stated that the team is working to make thread writing simpler.

It will be useful to have markers to designate the start and end of a tweet in the thread, although the exact implementation details remain unknown, as Financial Times product manager Matt Taylor noted. This makes it simpler for users to change the text in a way that doesn’t disrupt the reading flow.

Musk has previously addressed the problem of posting lengthy tweets. He previously stated that the social network is developing the capability to attach long-form content to tweets. If that will be a standalone feature from the new thread composer is unclear.

Currently, some users rely on third-party programs like Typefully, ThreadStart, and Chirr App, which offer capabilities like scheduling along with tools to automatically divide your post into threads without interfering with sentence flow.

Thanks to its acquisition of Threader the previous year, the company today provides Twitter Blue customers with a simple way to read threads. However, Musk hasn’t actually stated whether he is altering the reading experience for the typical user.

There is already a long-form writing program on Twitter called Notes, but it is exclusively available to a small number of writers, and under Musk’s leadership, its future is unclear.

Even though Twitter programmers are already working on it, it is unclear when the new composer tool for threads will launch. Since taking over the business, Musk has let go of more than half the employees.

Numerous executives have left, and the new leader even gave the remaining employees yesterday an ultimatum: either be “hardcore” or quit. There is no assurance that goods will be delivered on time in this situation.

The new Twitter Blue plan with a verification mark was hurriedly launched by the firm, only for the scheme to be discontinued a few days later. Musk stated earlier this week that the launch date had been moved to later in the month.

Wong just found code that suggests Twitter is working on encrypting direct communications from end to end.


Continue Reading