Connect with us

Technology

Investors rely on China’s equivalents to Nvidia’s auto chips

“With the market becoming crowded by a competitive environment, Investors are beginning to consider China’s equivalents to Nvidia auto chips.”

Published

on

Investors rely on China's equivalents to Nvidia's auto chips

With the market becoming crowded by a competitive environment, Investors are beginning to consider China’s equivalents to Nvidia auto chips.

As Beijing works to separate itself from American sophisticated technology while handling sanctions threats that have damaged Huawei’s lucrative smartphone sector, a crop of domestic semiconductor startups has emerged in China.

Chinese semiconductor companies, supported by venture capital, are vying to offer the finest alternatives to Nvidia and its contemporaries in the hotly debated field of autonomous driving.

China’s chip companies are experiencing a slump in the economy as they try to catch up with their American competitors, which are harming sales and investor interest. The Financial Times counted the number of Chinese chip-related businesses that have shut down during the past year and found over 3,400.

The best candidates, though, continue to receive funding. State-owned automaker Chery Automobile has lately invested in robotics company Robotics Horizons, which was formed by a veteran of Baidu’s deep learning program. Although the sum wasn’t made public, Horizon’s officially reported funding by the end of last year had surpassed $3.4 billion.

Investors rely on China's equivalents to Nvidia auto chips

One of the more significant Chinese firms attempting to challenge Nvidia’s dominance in the production of auto-grade processors is startup Black Sesame Technologies and telecom equipment behemoth Huawei. According to available information, Black Sesame has so far raised $115 million.

How does Horizon’s technology stack up to Nvidia’s, then? The American chip giant made headlines last week when it introduced Drive Thor, a new auto-grade processor that combines in-car technologies and autonomous driving.

The chip outperforms Nvidia’s current flagship Drive Orin, which offers 254 TOPS of performance, by 2,000 teraflops. A processor’s ability to perform one trillion floating-point operations per second is measured by TOPS.

The Journey 5 system-on-chip from Horizon Robotics, in contrast, boasts up to 128 TOPS and is said to be intended for Level 4 driving. Production of the chip is anticipated to begin in 2022.

It’s likely difficult for China’s automakers to pass up Nvidia’s cutting-edge chip, which is anticipated to dramatically improve vehicles’ smart driving and in-car entertainment capabilities.

The premium electric vehicle brand Zeekr from Geely, the largest private automaker in China, was one of the first to sign up. When the chip enters mass production in 2025, Zeekr wants to implement Drive Thor.

Investors rely on China's equivalents to Nvidia auto chips

Orin Drive already powers sophisticated driver assistance features in Xpeng’s G9 premium SUV, a Tesla rival based in Guangzhou. Internet behemoth Baidu’s EV brand Jidu, as well as American-listed EV upstarts NIO and Li Auto, are other Chinese manufacturers that have previously disclosed their usage of Nvidia’s Drive Orin.

Nvidia claims that despite new U.S. restrictions preventing it from exporting high-end data center chips to China, it is still permitted to send auto chips to Chinese customers.

Although there can be no assurances regarding Journey 5’s performance in its native market, Horizon reported last year that the chip had already attracted interest from a few local manufacturers, including SAIC Motor, Great Wall Motors, JAC Group, Changan Auto, and BYD. By the end of 2021, the Beijing-based business claimed to have shipped over a million of its Journey series semiconductors.

 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Technology

UK Government To Set Online Bill Criminalizing Self Harm

Published

on

UK Government Sets Online Bill To Criminalize Self Harm

In an effort to stop what it calls “tragic and preventable deaths caused by people seeing self-harm content online,” the UK government has announced it will further broaden the scope of online safety legislation by making encouraging self-harm a crime.

According to the most recent modification to the divisive but popular Online Safety Bill, in-scope platforms would be compelled to remove anything that purposefully encourages someone to physically harm themselves, or face legal repercussions.

The government intends to tackle “abhorrent trolls urging the young and vulnerable to self-harm,” according to the secretary of state for digital. People who post such content online may also be prosecuted under the new offence of encouraging self injury.

The maximum fines will be announced in due time, according to the administration.

In the UK, it is already unlawful to promote or aid suicide, whether in person or online. By creating a new offense, self-harm content will now be subject to the same laws that already ban suicide promotion.

Following a snag, last summer associated with political unrest in the ruling Conservative Party, the Online Safety Bill’s progress through parliament is now on hold. However, the newly reorganized UK government has declared that it will reintroduce the measure to parliament next month after making changes to the law.

The abuse of intimate imagery is a problem that will be addressed by recent revisions to the Online Safety Bill, which was just made public by the Ministry of Justice. However, other revisions are planned regarding “legal but harmful” information, thus the final form of the Act is still up in the air.

The government responded to concerns about the bill’s impact on online freedom of expression a few months ago. The (new) secretary of state, Michelle Donelan, announced in September that she would be “editing” the bill to lessen concern about its impact on “legal but harmful” speech for adults.

The most recent changes, making it illegal to send online communications encouraging self harm, came after that announcement.

UK Government Sets Online Bill To Criminalize Self Harm

Donelan was quoted by the BBC as claiming that Molly Russell, a 14-year-old teenager who committed suicide five years ago after watching thousands of online articles on self-harm and suicide on websites like Instagram and Pinterest, was a factor in the most recent changes.

Social media was found to have contributed to Russell’s death, according to the results of an inquest into her death in September. While the coroner’s “prevention of future deaths” report from last month that a number of steps be done to control and monitor young people’s access to social media content.

The addition of the crime of promoting self harm, according to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media, and Sport, will outlaw “one of the most worrying and prevalent internet harms that now falls below the threshold of criminal behavior.”

Donelan stated in a statement:

“I am determined that the abhorrent trolls encouraging the young and vulnerable to self-harm are brought to justice.

“So I am strengthening our online safety laws to make sure these vile acts are stamped out and the perpetrators face jail time.

“Social media firms can no longer remain silent bystanders either and they’ll face fines for allowing this abusive and destructive behaviour to continue on their platforms under our laws.”

Hate crimes, rules regarding revenge porn (including disseminating deepfake porn without content), harassment, and cyberstalking are among the other top criminal offenses already mentioned in the bill.

Regardless of what the measure states on paper, there are still a lot of unknowns regarding how platforms will react to having legal obligations imposed on them to police all forms of speech, as well as if it would actually increase web user safety as claimed.

Critics worry that the regime will have a chilling effect by turning platforms into de facto speech police and encouraging them to overblock content in order to reduce their legal risk of paying a hefty fine.

The regime’s penalties scale up to 10% of global annual turnover, and non-cooperative senior executives even run the risk of going to jail.

On Monday, December 5, the bill is scheduled to return to parliament.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continue Reading

Technology

Twitter Amnesty Is What Elon Musk is Going For Next

Published

on

Twitter Amnesty Is What Elon Musk is Going For Next

Tesla CEO and newly appointed Twitter CEO, Elon Musk did promise a new dimension for the micro-blogging social media platform prior to taking over, and his actions recently, have just about lived up to the promise, but now, the billionaire is set for an ‘amnesty’ that surely will drive some political divides nuts if certain individuals are granted Twitter amnesty as he wants.

Elon Musk announced on Thursday that starting the next week, Twitter will provide suspended accounts “a general amnesty.” The day before, the platform’s CEO published a poll asking users if they thought affected accounts should be restored.

The announcement comes just after Musk lifted the platform’s restriction on former president Donald Trump after conducting a related poll. Trump declared he had no intention of returning to the platform despite being banned following the attack on the US Capitol on January 6, 2021.

Users of the Twitter platform who had their accounts suspended could rejoin the network “assuming they have not broken the law or engaged in egregious spam,” according to Musk’s user survey.

Twitter Amnesty Is What Elon Musk is Going For Next

The survey received responses from about 3.2 million individuals, who voted 72.4% in favor of amnesty.

“The people have spoken. Amnesty begins next week. Vox Populi, Vox Dei,” Musk said, using a Latin phrase that means “The voice of the people is the voice of god.”

Historically, Twitter has deactivated accounts who advocate violence, celebrate hate and harassment, or persistently disseminate false information that may be harmful.

Some well-known people who were banned from the website include MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell, who made a number of claims that Trump actually won the 2020 presidential election, former Trump advisor and former executive chairman of Breitbart Steve Bannon, who said Anthony Fauci and FBI Director Christopher Wray should be beheaded, and Proud Boys founder Gavin McInnes, who broke the website’s rule against violent extremist groups.

Considering that more voices with possibly negative views will be returning to the site, it’s unclear from Musk’s brief post how Twitter will handle content control going forward.

These worries have only grown as a result of Musk’s huge firings and the outflow of workers who would rather leave than remain “hardcore.”

Elon Musk is surely growing more unpopular by remaining popular these days.

Continue Reading

Technology

Twitter Working On New Feature For Long Texts

Published

on

Twitter Working On New Feature For Long Texts

Writing a thread on Twitter can be considered daunting especially when you have to divide the text into 280-character sections for it to make meaning.

Good news though as the platform is stated to be working on a way to convert lengthy texts into threads automatically.

When a tweet exceeds the 280-character limit, Twitter’s composer will automatically divide it into a thread, according to a tweet from app researcher Jane Manchun Wong.

Twitter wants to make making threads less difficult, as she stated in a message to a user (identified as me).

Currently, in order to add a tweet to a thread and post the subsequent 280 characters, users must click the Add button. This can be particularly unpleasant when you are trying out an idea or pasting information from another document.

Several users have recently brought up the difficulty posting to and reading conversations with more than a few tweets; the thread in question was 82 tweets long and focused on the defunct crypto-currency exchange FTX. In response, Musk stated that the team is working to make thread writing simpler.

It will be useful to have markers to designate the start and end of a tweet in the thread, although the exact implementation details remain unknown, as Financial Times product manager Matt Taylor noted. This makes it simpler for users to change the text in a way that doesn’t disrupt the reading flow.

Musk has previously addressed the problem of posting lengthy tweets. He previously stated that the social network is developing the capability to attach long-form content to tweets. If that will be a standalone feature from the new thread composer is unclear.

Currently, some users rely on third-party programs like Typefully, ThreadStart, and Chirr App, which offer capabilities like scheduling along with tools to automatically divide your post into threads without interfering with sentence flow.

Thanks to its acquisition of Threader the previous year, the company today provides Twitter Blue customers with a simple way to read threads. However, Musk hasn’t actually stated whether he is altering the reading experience for the typical user.

There is already a long-form writing program on Twitter called Notes, but it is exclusively available to a small number of writers, and under Musk’s leadership, its future is unclear.

Even though Twitter programmers are already working on it, it is unclear when the new composer tool for threads will launch. Since taking over the business, Musk has let go of more than half the employees.

Numerous executives have left, and the new leader even gave the remaining employees yesterday an ultimatum: either be “hardcore” or quit. There is no assurance that goods will be delivered on time in this situation.

The new Twitter Blue plan with a verification mark was hurriedly launched by the firm, only for the scheme to be discontinued a few days later. Musk stated earlier this week that the launch date had been moved to later in the month.

Wong just found code that suggests Twitter is working on encrypting direct communications from end to end.

 

Continue Reading

Trending