Elon Musk may have stated the deal is back on, but his court battle with Twitter is still creating some last-minute twists and turns. Just before Musk reversed course, a judge allowed Twitter the right to search for private conversations with whistleblower.
Judge Kathaleen McCormick responded to Twitter’s request for extra discovery on potential messages between Musk’s inner circle and the Twitter whistleblower, former security chief Peiter “Mudge” Zatko, in a late-Monday filing with the Delaware Court of Chancery.
Twitter wants to continue investigating despite Zatko’s sworn denial that he got in touch with Musk or his team because of a puzzling email dated May 6 that surfaced in Quinn Emanuel’s records, the law firm that represents Musk.
On that date, someone specifically reached out using an anonymous ProtonMail account under the pretense of being a “former executive at Twitter overseeing teams directly involved in trust & safety/content moderation.”
In the email, the sender advises that Musk’s team contact them using “alternative secure ways” in order to offer information regarding Twitter.
While Twitter pushed to scan all digital communications, including texts, instant conversations, and printed documents, from a wider swath of Musk’s close connections, Musk’s team wished to limit any extra search for potential messages with Zatko.
The argument made by Musk’s legal team that additional discovery is immaterial in light of Zatko’s rejection was rejected by Judge McCormick in a recent letter.
Additionally, she refuted the claim that there is nothing more to learn from further searches because the email, which was received to Musk attorney Alex Spiro, wasn’t shared to anybody else:
Defendants’ interrogatory responses do not waive Plaintiff’s right to challenge those responses through document discovery; if they did, document discovery would not frequently be allowed, the Judge explained.
Although sworn, Zatko’s testimony cannot now be judged for reliability, hence it is not conclusive. Additionally, the Defendants’ claims in relation to the email from May 6 pose significant issues.
For instance, the defendants don’t say whether anyone responded to the email from May 6 or tried to identify the source in any way, whether they were successful or not. It seems at least conceivable that Zatko was the author based on the timing and the substance of the email from May 6.
According to McCormick, Twitter has the authority to determine whether it had any prior interaction with Musk or Musk’s team that hasn’t been made public because
Musk heavily relies on Zatko’s fresh revelations. In the end, she claims that Twitter may hunt up information “beyond emails,” including in paper files, by employing 15 search phrases of their choosing.
By this Friday, October 7, Musk’s team was required to deliver the additional paperwork. If there is still a trial, Spiro would also have to provide details of what he did after receiving the anonymous email in an affidavit that must be submitted by this Wednesday, October 5.
In exchange for the Chancery Court “adjourning the trial and all other processes connected thereto to such closing or further order of the Court,” Musk commits to purchase Twitter as promised. The SEC received Musk’s letter to Twitter.
If Musk were involved, it can be presumed that a letter of intent filed with the SEC would signify a completed transaction, but nothing about this entire saga has ever resembled a completed transaction.
Both the timing of Musk’s decision to abruptly put the deal back on track and the enigmatic email from May 6—questions to which, if the trial is actually postponed, we may never receive an answer—are puzzling.
UK Government To Set Online Bill Criminalizing Self Harm
In an effort to stop what it calls “tragic and preventable deaths caused by people seeing self-harm content online,” the UK government has announced it will further broaden the scope of online safety legislation by making encouraging self-harm a crime.
According to the most recent modification to the divisive but popular Online Safety Bill, in-scope platforms would be compelled to remove anything that purposefully encourages someone to physically harm themselves, or face legal repercussions.
The government intends to tackle “abhorrent trolls urging the young and vulnerable to self-harm,” according to the secretary of state for digital. People who post such content online may also be prosecuted under the new offence of encouraging self injury.
The maximum fines will be announced in due time, according to the administration.
In the UK, it is already unlawful to promote or aid suicide, whether in person or online. By creating a new offense, self-harm content will now be subject to the same laws that already ban suicide promotion.
Following a snag, last summer associated with political unrest in the ruling Conservative Party, the Online Safety Bill’s progress through parliament is now on hold. However, the newly reorganized UK government has declared that it will reintroduce the measure to parliament next month after making changes to the law.
The abuse of intimate imagery is a problem that will be addressed by recent revisions to the Online Safety Bill, which was just made public by the Ministry of Justice. However, other revisions are planned regarding “legal but harmful” information, thus the final form of the Act is still up in the air.
The government responded to concerns about the bill’s impact on online freedom of expression a few months ago. The (new) secretary of state, Michelle Donelan, announced in September that she would be “editing” the bill to lessen concern about its impact on “legal but harmful” speech for adults.
The most recent changes, making it illegal to send online communications encouraging self harm, came after that announcement.
Donelan was quoted by the BBC as claiming that Molly Russell, a 14-year-old teenager who committed suicide five years ago after watching thousands of online articles on self-harm and suicide on websites like Instagram and Pinterest, was a factor in the most recent changes.
Social media was found to have contributed to Russell’s death, according to the results of an inquest into her death in September. While the coroner’s “prevention of future deaths” report from last month that a number of steps be done to control and monitor young people’s access to social media content.
The addition of the crime of promoting self harm, according to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media, and Sport, will outlaw “one of the most worrying and prevalent internet harms that now falls below the threshold of criminal behavior.”
Donelan stated in a statement:
“I am determined that the abhorrent trolls encouraging the young and vulnerable to self-harm are brought to justice.
“So I am strengthening our online safety laws to make sure these vile acts are stamped out and the perpetrators face jail time.
“Social media firms can no longer remain silent bystanders either and they’ll face fines for allowing this abusive and destructive behaviour to continue on their platforms under our laws.”
Hate crimes, rules regarding revenge porn (including disseminating deepfake porn without content), harassment, and cyberstalking are among the other top criminal offenses already mentioned in the bill.
Regardless of what the measure states on paper, there are still a lot of unknowns regarding how platforms will react to having legal obligations imposed on them to police all forms of speech, as well as if it would actually increase web user safety as claimed.
Critics worry that the regime will have a chilling effect by turning platforms into de facto speech police and encouraging them to overblock content in order to reduce their legal risk of paying a hefty fine.
The regime’s penalties scale up to 10% of global annual turnover, and non-cooperative senior executives even run the risk of going to jail.
On Monday, December 5, the bill is scheduled to return to parliament.
Twitter Amnesty Is What Elon Musk is Going For Next
Tesla CEO and newly appointed Twitter CEO, Elon Musk did promise a new dimension for the micro-blogging social media platform prior to taking over, and his actions recently, have just about lived up to the promise, but now, the billionaire is set for an ‘amnesty’ that surely will drive some political divides nuts if certain individuals are granted Twitter amnesty as he wants.
Elon Musk announced on Thursday that starting the next week, Twitter will provide suspended accounts “a general amnesty.” The day before, the platform’s CEO published a poll asking users if they thought affected accounts should be restored.
The announcement comes just after Musk lifted the platform’s restriction on former president Donald Trump after conducting a related poll. Trump declared he had no intention of returning to the platform despite being banned following the attack on the US Capitol on January 6, 2021.
Users of the Twitter platform who had their accounts suspended could rejoin the network “assuming they have not broken the law or engaged in egregious spam,” according to Musk’s user survey.
The survey received responses from about 3.2 million individuals, who voted 72.4% in favor of amnesty.
“The people have spoken. Amnesty begins next week. Vox Populi, Vox Dei,” Musk said, using a Latin phrase that means “The voice of the people is the voice of god.”
Historically, Twitter has deactivated accounts who advocate violence, celebrate hate and harassment, or persistently disseminate false information that may be harmful.
Some well-known people who were banned from the website include MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell, who made a number of claims that Trump actually won the 2020 presidential election, former Trump advisor and former executive chairman of Breitbart Steve Bannon, who said Anthony Fauci and FBI Director Christopher Wray should be beheaded, and Proud Boys founder Gavin McInnes, who broke the website’s rule against violent extremist groups.
Considering that more voices with possibly negative views will be returning to the site, it’s unclear from Musk’s brief post how Twitter will handle content control going forward.
These worries have only grown as a result of Musk’s huge firings and the outflow of workers who would rather leave than remain “hardcore.”
Elon Musk is surely growing more unpopular by remaining popular these days.
Twitter Working On New Feature For Long Texts
Writing a thread on Twitter can be considered daunting especially when you have to divide the text into 280-character sections for it to make meaning.
Good news though as the platform is stated to be working on a way to convert lengthy texts into threads automatically.
When a tweet exceeds the 280-character limit, Twitter’s composer will automatically divide it into a thread, according to a tweet from app researcher Jane Manchun Wong.
Twitter wants to make making threads less difficult, as she stated in a message to a user (identified as me).
Currently, in order to add a tweet to a thread and post the subsequent 280 characters, users must click the Add button. This can be particularly unpleasant when you are trying out an idea or pasting information from another document.
Several users have recently brought up the difficulty posting to and reading conversations with more than a few tweets; the thread in question was 82 tweets long and focused on the defunct crypto-currency exchange FTX. In response, Musk stated that the team is working to make thread writing simpler.
It will be useful to have markers to designate the start and end of a tweet in the thread, although the exact implementation details remain unknown, as Financial Times product manager Matt Taylor noted. This makes it simpler for users to change the text in a way that doesn’t disrupt the reading flow.
Musk has previously addressed the problem of posting lengthy tweets. He previously stated that the social network is developing the capability to attach long-form content to tweets. If that will be a standalone feature from the new thread composer is unclear.
Currently, some users rely on third-party programs like Typefully, ThreadStart, and Chirr App, which offer capabilities like scheduling along with tools to automatically divide your post into threads without interfering with sentence flow.
Thanks to its acquisition of Threader the previous year, the company today provides Twitter Blue customers with a simple way to read threads. However, Musk hasn’t actually stated whether he is altering the reading experience for the typical user.
There is already a long-form writing program on Twitter called Notes, but it is exclusively available to a small number of writers, and under Musk’s leadership, its future is unclear.
Even though Twitter programmers are already working on it, it is unclear when the new composer tool for threads will launch. Since taking over the business, Musk has let go of more than half the employees.
Numerous executives have left, and the new leader even gave the remaining employees yesterday an ultimatum: either be “hardcore” or quit. There is no assurance that goods will be delivered on time in this situation.
The new Twitter Blue plan with a verification mark was hurriedly launched by the firm, only for the scheme to be discontinued a few days later. Musk stated earlier this week that the launch date had been moved to later in the month.
Wong just found code that suggests Twitter is working on encrypting direct communications from end to end.
Technology4 weeks ago
Jack Dorsey Sends Apology To Sacked Twitter Staff
Technology4 weeks ago
Twitter Risks Legal Suit Over Employee Layoffs
Technology4 weeks ago
Twitter Begins Testing The $8 Blue Tick Subscription On IOS
Technology3 weeks ago
The Big Startup Guns With The Most Funding In Africa
Technology3 weeks ago
Transcorp Power Raises Electricity Generation to 638mw In Months
Technology3 weeks ago
Top Logistics Startup Firms In Nigeria
Immigration3 weeks ago
Salzburg Global Seminar Providing Undergraduates Internship Privilege In Austria
Technology3 weeks ago
Amazon Prepares To Lay Off Staff